Part One:
Some striking similarities
by
Damien F. Mackey
‘Because of this I will weep and wail; I
will go about barefoot and naked.
I will howl like a jackal and moan like an owl.
For Samaria’s plague is incurable; it has spread to Judah’.
I will howl like a jackal and moan like an owl.
For Samaria’s plague is incurable; it has spread to Judah’.
Micah
1:8-9
“In the year that the supreme commander, sent by Sargon
king of Assyria, came to Ashdod and attacked and captured it— at that time
the Lord spoke through Isaiah son of Amoz. He said to him, ‘Take off the
sackcloth from your body and the sandals from your feet’. And he did so, going
around stripped and barefoot”.
Isaiah 20:1-2
This is not the only instance of the prophets
Micah and Isaiah saying/doing the same thing.
Consider the following extraordinary case of almost
word-for-word parallelism:
Micah 4:1-3
|
Isaiah 2:2-4
|
In days to come the mountain of the Lord’s house
shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be raised up
above the hills. Peoples shall stream to it, and many nations shall come and
say: ‘Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God
of Jacob; that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths’.
For out of Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
He shall judge between many peoples, and shall arbitrate between strong
nations far away; they shall beat their
swords into plowshares, and their spears
into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up
sword against nation, neither shall they
learn war any more ….
|
In days to come the mountain of the Lord’s house
shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be raised
above the hills; all the nations shall stream to it. Many peoples shall come
and say, ‘Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the
God of Jacob; that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his
paths’. For out of Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of the Lord
from Jerusalem. He shall judge between the nations, and shall arbitrate for
many peoples; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears
into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither
shall they learn war any more.
|
We know that these two prophets were contemporaries,
both living at least during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah. Cf. Jeremiah
26:18: “Micah
of Moresheth prophesied in the days of
Hezekiah king of Judah. He told all the people of Judah, ‘This is what the
LORD Almighty says: “Zion will be plowed like a field, Jerusalem will become a
heap of rubble, the temple hill a mound overgrown with thickets”’,” and Isaiah 1:1: “The vision
concerning Judah and Jerusalem that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of
Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings
of Judah”.
And
we can extend that contemporaneity even further, to include King Jotham (Micah
1:1): “The word of the Lord
that came to Micah of Moresheth during the reigns of Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah,
kings of Judah—the vision he saw concerning Samaria and Jerusalem”.
But
commentators - struck by such similarities between the two prophets as those noted
above - are nevertheless divided about who may have borrowed from whom.
Philip
J. King, for instance, writing on “Micah” for The Jerome Biblical
Commentary (1968), believed that it was Isaiah who had influenced Micah (17:7,
p. 284): “... the influence [upon Micah] of Isaiah, also Hosea and Amos, is
evident”. {This may seem to be a logical conclusion considering that, whilst Isaiah
informs us in 1:1 that he had been prophesying as far back as the reign of King
Uzziah Judah, Micah (qua Micah) can claim
to have gone back only as far as the reign of Uzziah’ son, Jotham}.
James-Michael
Smith, however, in his “Micah 4 and Isaiah
2: Who Borrowed from Who??”, is far less decisive (http://jmsmith.org/downloads/Micah-4-and-Isaiah-2-Who-Borrowed-from-Who.pdf):
Because of their
almost identical nature however, these two prophecies also raise controversy regarding
authorship and inspiration. Are Micah 4:1-5 and Isaiah 2:1-5 two different prophecies
given to two different prophets on two separate occasions? Or are they two remnants
of one original anonymous saying, which was adapted into the books named after
these prophets hundreds of years later? Or perhaps Micah was the original
author and Isaiah borrowed from him—or vice versa.
[End of
quote]
What I think is certain - on the basis of the
undeniable similarities referred to above - is that there must have been a very
close relationship between these two contemporary prophets, Micah and Isaiah.
And, in Part
Two, I hope to be more specific about the nature of this perceived relationship.
Part Two:
Simeonites in
northern Israel
“Nor ... is the most important
geographical detail in the book [of Judith], namely
the reference to a Jewish (Simeonite)
settlement on the border of the valley of
Dothan, a fabrication. For a
combination of various sources (Meg. Ta’an, for 25
Marheshvan (chap. 8); Jos., Ant.
13:275f., 379f; Wars 1:93f.; and also apparently I
Macc. 5:23) shows that at the time of
the return in the region of Samaria, in the
neighbourhood of what was known as “the
cities of Nebhrakta,” there was a
Jewish-Simeonite settlement ...”.
J. Bruns, “Judith, Book of” (NCE 8, 2003).
Introduction
In Part One we discovered that the
contemporaneity of the two prophets under consideration, Micah and Isaiah,
extended at least from King Jotham of Judah until King Hezekiah of Judah. Although
Isaiah can claim to go back even further, to the time of Jotham’s father, King
Uzziah, this may not be all that chronologically significant, given that the
leprous Uzziah had required his son, Jotham, to co-rule with him.
According e.g. to http://www.vtaide.com/gleanings/Kings-of-Israel/biography_Jotham.html
King Jotham ascended to become
Judah's eleventh ruler while his father, King Uzziah, still lived, this unusual
arrangement being necessary because of Uzziah's medical retirement. Jotham
apparently reigned for 13 years while his father lived, then three more years
after his death.
Micah may actually be able to ‘trump’ Isaiah
here if I am right in identifying the former with Amos, whose career as a
prophet extended back even to Jeroboam II. See my:
Merging Prophet Amos with Micah. Part One: Geography
and:
Merging Prophet Amos with Micah. Part Two: Chronology
This, Amos = Micah, is an identification that
I had already advanced in my university thesis:
A Revised History
of the Era of King Hezekiah of Judah
and its Background
(Volume Two, pp.
87-102: EXCURSUS: LIFE AND TIMES OF HEZEKIAH’S CONTEMPORARY,
ISAIAH), though there I had somewhat over-done my use of alter egos.
But one extension
of Amos = Micah that I had employed
there - namely, that the prophet Micah was also the same person as the
Simeonite “Micah” of “Bethulia” in the Book of Judith, coupled with this Micah’s
son, “Uzziah”, being Isaiah himself - I am still inclined to retain.
Isaiah
and his
Prophet
father
Taking, now,
some still relevant (as I see it) parts of my Excursus on Isaiah:
Relevant to my efforts to merge KCI [Kings, Chronicles, Isaiah] with BOJ
[Book of Judith] is the need now to test whether Isaiah finds his appropriate
match in the Simeonite Uzziah,
chief magistrate of Bethulia, who – in
the context of my reconstruction – must have been a great man in Hezekiah’s kingdom.
We saw recently, in Chapter 3 (on p. 67), that Uzziah was
entitled both ‘the prince of Judah’ and ‘the prince of the people of Israel’.
Now such an identification, of Isaiah with Uzziah, would
necessitate that Uzziah’s father, Micah,
be the same as Isaiah’s father, Amos
(or Amoz). This is interesting. Whilst the names Amos and Micah do not immediately
appear to share any similarity whatsoever, scholars find an incredible similarity
though between whom they consider to be these ‘two’ prophets. Thus King:1356
Not only did Micah live in the vicinity of Amos’ home, Tekoa, but he was
like Amos in many respects. He was so much influenced by the spirit of Amos
that he has been called “Amos redivivus”.
Both [sic] rustic prophets attacked in
a direct and forceful way the socio-economic abuses of their day.
Micah’s origins we do know. He hailed from the town of ‘Moresheth’
(Micah 1:1) - thought to be Moresheth-Gath, a border town of southern Judah. It is in this
location, Moresheth-Gath, I suggest, that we discover the place of origin of
Isaiah and his father.
Comment: For a clearer view of this, see my “Merging Prophet Amos with Micah. Part One: Geography” (above).
Amos began his prophetic ministry in the latter days of … Jeroboam II of
Israel (c. 785-743 BC, conventional dates …). ….
Comment: For a clearer view of this, see my “Merging Prophet Amos with Micah. Part Two: Chronology” (above).
Amos was called to leave Judah and testify in the north against the
injustices of Samaria. (Cf. Micah 1:2-7). Most interestingly, Amos was to be
found preaching in the northern Bethel, which I have identified with Bethulia of BOJ
(refer back to pp. 71-72 of this volume). Not unexpectedly, Amos’ presence
there at the time of Jeroboam II was not appreciated by the Bethelite
priesthood, who regarded him as a conspirator from the southern kingdom (Amos
7:10). Being the man that he was, though, Amos would unlikely have been frightened
away by Jeroboam’s priest, Amaziah, when he had urged Amos (vv.12-13): ‘O seer,
go, flee away to the land of Judah, earn your bread there, and prophesy there;
but never again prophesy at Bethel, for it is the king’s sanctuary, and it is
the temple of the kingdom’. Still, Amos may not have settled permanently in the
north at this time, but may have waited until the fall of Jeroboam II and his
régime in Israel and the onset of the long interregnum there.
Presumably Amos had chosen Bethel/Bethulia
in which to settle because there, more
than likely, he had Simeonite ancestors. Judith’s husband Manasseh would later
be buried near Bethulia “with his ancestors” (Judith 8:3). This town would
thus have been one of those locations in which the migrant Simeonites of king
Asa of Judah’s reign (more than a century earlier) had chosen to settle;
perhaps re-naming the place Bethul
[Bethel] after a Simeonite town of that
name in south western Judah (Joshua 19:4).
….
If these connections are valid, then Isaiah must therefore have
accompanied his father to the north …. He would continue prophesying right down
to the time of king Hezekiah ….
…. Whilst this Simeonite family was not descended from the prophetic
line, as Amos himself would testify to the priest of Bethel (7:14), it was
certainly a ‘family’ from the point of view of its striking the same prophetic
chord. Commentators have recognised a similar strain in the writings of Amos, Micah, Hosea and Isaiah, whilst having no idea of what was - at least, as
far as I see it - their proper (father-to-son) relationship. Thus King has written,
in regard to the prophet Micah:1362 “... the influence [upon Micah] of Isaiah, also Hosea
and Amos, is evident”. But it was rather Micah,
as Amos, I
suggest, who was doing the ‘influencing’; he upon his son Isaiah ….
Micah
and Isaiah were, as I said, a father-and-son prophetic combination.
No comments:
Post a Comment